Radio Show Archive(s):

October 30, 2010

(November 6, 2010 was a reply of the October 30 show above.)

November 13, 2010

On www.RepublicBroadcasting.org 12pm CST every Saturday

Third Rail Topics for Today:

Here are some of the items discussed on the October 30, 2010 episode.

Citizens Against Government Waste Commercial:

Deficit Trials TV commercial, that was purportedly banned in 1986:

For November 13, 2010 --

Results of the Narcisse for Governor race in Iowa.
http://www.narcisseforiowa.com

Dr. Shirley Moore (CA) from 2007:

Family Preservation Rally 2007, Lincoln Memorial, 8/18/07; Dr. Moore, Nat'l Dir., Legislative Affairs, AFRA; Pres., Praying Hands for Justice, speaks about how to clean up court corruption from her own experience in helping to open up 30,000 foster care cases in L.A. County. DrshirleyM@aol.com, http://www.drshirleymoore.com/index.html
Radio Programs:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/DrShirley
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Justice4us

---------------

14th Amendment Explained in Layman's Terms:

Prior to the alleged ratification of the 14th Amendment, there was no legal definition of a "citizen of the United States", as everyone had primary citizenship in one of the several states. The Constitution referred to the sovereign state citizen, and no one else. Those who went to Washington, D.C. or outside the several states were commonly called "citizens of the United States." In the Constitution for the United States, the term was used to identify state citizens who were eligible under the suffrage laws to hold office, and they were required under the Constitution to have primary allegiance to one of the several states.
Read more here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4xV4MTnCdc&feature=related

------------------
Paul Craig Robert's article on RBN website, "America’s Devolution Into Dictatorship"

Mr. Robert's calls to attention the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), who have filed a lawsuit challenging the government's asserted authority to carry out “targeted killings” of U.S. citizens located far from any armed conflict zone.

ACLU postings here: http://www.aclu.org/national-security/al-aulaqi-v-obama

http://www.aclu.org/national-security/obama-administration-claims-unchec...

"The government filed a brief in the case in September, claiming that the executive's targeted killing authority is a "political question" that should not be subject to judicial review. The government also asserted the "state secrets" privilege, contending that the case should be dismissed to avoid the disclosure of sensitive information."

Excellent Salon.com article here:
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/08/30/assassinati...

The September 28, 2010 DOJ filing that all of these articles summarize and quote from is posted here on Scribd.com

http://www.scribd.com/doc/38129561/Aulaqi-v-Obama-DOJ-Main-Brief

Aulaqi v. Obama DOJ Main Brief

Note: Why do we not, as a nation and as an Executive Branch or Legislature, invoke the Constitutional Letters of Marque and Reprisal?

History of Marque and Reprisal: http://www.constitution.org/mil/lmr/lmr.htm

Ron Paul on Letters of Marque and Reprisal: